- NHF members reside in these countries:
Californian Victory: Fluoride makes it into the TOP 9 of chemicals to be reviewed under Proposition 65
By Paul Connett
June 11, 2009
So pat yourself on the back if you sent in comments to the OEHHA (Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment). This was a mighty victory and could well spell the end of fluoridation if the Carcinogen Identification Committee eventually rules that fluoride is a probable carcinogen. See excellent submissions from:
The National Health Federation at http://www.thenhf.com/fluoridation/fluoridation_172/fluoridation_172.htm
Kathleen Thiessen at http://fluoridealert.org/thiessen-2009-1.pdf
The Environmental Working Group at http://fluoridealert.org/ewg-may2009-1.pdf
FAN: Chris Neurath and Paul Connett: Current epidemiological research on a link between fluoride and osteosarcoma (paper presented at the 2008 Fluoride conference in Toronto) at http://fluoridealert.org/neurath-2008b.pdf
FAN: Chris Neurath, Evidence supporting prioritizing fluoride for carcinogenicity hazard identification at http://fluoridealert.org/neurath-2009.may5.pdf
FAN: Paul Connett, Fluoride and osteosarcoma at http://fluoridealert.org/ca.prop65.connett.html
Meanwhile, there are efforts to do away with the OEHHA due to severe state budget deficits!
