One of the most rewarding things about being part of the
ever-growing health freedom movement, is that there is
always an upside to what often looks like a bleak and losing
battle against the monolith we call “modern medicine”. In
addition, some of the people you meet, even if only by phone
or by e-mail, turn out to be spectacular human beings that
reaffirm your faith in your fellow man. In short, ordinary
people can do extraordinary things when put to the test.
If you recall, back in August, Elissa and I wrote two
articles “Diabetics to be Tracked Down by Government
Agents” and “The Bitter Truth About Regulation of
Sugar Substitutes” which pretty well covered the sorry
tale of how sugar and sugar substitutes can ruin your
health, if not kill you, outright. These articles also
covered the dirty and downright corrupt politics behind how
and why the FDA and other government agencies protect both
the sugar industry as well as Big Pharma.
We barely scratched the surface of this saga of blatant
corruption in high places. For more up-to-the-minute details
on the horrors of aspartame, the center of the fake sugar
controversy, the focus of today’s story, and what ordinary
people in New Mexico are doing about it, you may want to
check out detailed information gathered by my friend, Dr.
Betty Martini, head of Mission Possible at
www.dorway.com. You may also
want to peruse one of the key pages on this site that
provides a document listing 92 symptoms caused by aspartame
that had to be pried out of the FDA’s own records by Freedom
of Information Act means. This should show you that the FDA
is not ignorant of the real facts about aspartame.
At the time we wrote those two previous articles, we were
not aware of the high drama going on in New Mexico. The man
most responsible for this hullabaloo, that has been going on
since 1999, is an art gallery owner, Stephen Fox, who, along
with his fellow citizens, just got fed up enough about
aspartame in the food supply to take action. Fox, after
doing his legal homework, sat down with a pencil and wrote
legislation to create a state Nutrition Council with
statutory powers to challenge the FDA if it mistakenly
approves known carcinogens and neurotoxic food additives.
The 2005 version of the bill passed the state Senate by an
overwhelming 32-1 but after corporate lobbyists arm twisted
their way through the cloakroom, it was killed in the House
by a filibuster on the last day of the session. [See the
video on Aspartame "Sweet Misery"]
Fox and his army of outraged citizens, doctors, lawyers,
activists and victims, armed with the knowledge that New
Mexico has the legal authority to ban aspartame, have just
turned up the volume and expanded the campaign. PLEASE NOTE
FOLKS, your state may also have the same legal power to ban
aspartame, so you can learn from what Fox is doing and start
your own campaign to make your state’s public servants do a
proper job of protecting your food supply. In fact, when we
interviewed Fox, he said he would be more than happy to help
activists in other states and provinces in their battle to
remove aspartame from the marketplace. We already know
people who are going to take him up on his generous offer.
You can reach Fox at stephen@santafefineart.com.
The 2006 campaign to get rid of aspartame is now expanding
on two fronts. On the first front, another Nutrition Council
bill has been introduced with the political support of
Governor Bill Richardson, who has enthusiastically placed it
on the agenda for the 2006 short session, which he controls,
doubly endorsing it with an Executive Message.
The purpose of the bill is the same as the last one - to
establish, by statute, a state agency called the Nutrition
Council with the statutory power to challenge the FDA if it
approves known carcinogens and neurotoxic food additives.
On the second front, there is a hearing, scheduled for July
2006, convened by the New Mexico Environmental Improvement
Board (EIB) and the State’s Attorney General, a plan that
was conceived after much public pressure from Fox and
company. As you would expect, corporate lawyers from the
makers of aspartame have threatened litigation to prevent
the hearing from taking place, though, at the moment,
Governor Richardson is standing firm that there needs to be
a fair hearing.
One wonders on what grounds such a lawsuit would be based?
Is it the need to prevent public servants from doing their
job to protect the public? Or, more to the point, the need
to protect Big Pharma’s profits over the lives and health of
innocent consumers?
Elissa’s and my fellow health freedom activist, Jim Turner,
who has been the principle critic of aspartame from his
earliest days as one of Ralph Nader’s Raiders and author of
The Chemical Feast: The Nader Report on Food Protection
and the FDA, has already provided New Mexico officials
his official legal position on aspartame in the marketplace,
which you can read in its entirety. In it, Turner reviews
his 35-year history spent fighting this poison. He states
that aspartame violates both federal and New Mexico food
adulteration statutes and that the FDA approval process was
so flawed as to be legally void.
Another high-profile attorney, Edward M. Johnson, now
retired after an illustrious career which resulted in his
being listed for the past 15 years in “Who’s Who in
American Law”, also weighed in on this campaign.
Johnson, noted for his expertise in several related areas of
law including the relationship between federal and state
statutes as well as now being an owner of a distributorship
of health and wellness products, not to mention being a
victim of aspartame-caused brain tumors, offered his legal
position to state officials which also includes the comment,
“The banning of aspartame is not only well within your
powers, but is in fact a long overdue service to New
Mexico’s consumers who are ingesting this product unknowing
its toxicity.”
“You are to be commended for having moved this rule
change along this far to take this much needed step of
banning aspartame in New Mexico in order to protect the
health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the State of
New Mexico. Other states will follow New Mexico’s example.”
H.J. Roberts, M.D. F.A.C.P., F.C.C.P. one of America’s
premier physicians, and author of four books on the dangers
of aspartame, has written directly to Governor Richardson
several times about the need to curtail and ban aspartame’s
use. In a phone interview for this article, Dr. Roberts told
us, “Aspartame should not have been approved in the first
place. It was approved arbitrarily and unilaterally on the
advice of in house FDA scientists. However, the General
Accounting Office and a public board of inquiry both agreed
that it should not be approved. After more than 20 years of
clinical encounters and research and newer information, we
now know that it constitutes an imminent public health
hazard. New Mexico should be given credit for a lot of
courage in looking into this matter because the Federal
Government has not pursued it in any way it should have
considering the large number of complaints.”
http://sunsentpress.com
As to be expected in a David versus Goliath fight of this
magnitude, lots of people get involved and, by coincidence,
the clamor about the evils of aspartame is now being heard
'round the world'.
In September 2005, The Ecologist, a major British
scientific publication, published a 17-page cover story on
the tangled web of deceit surrounding the approval of
aspartame by the FDA and other regulatory bodies worldwide.
In addition, the publication of a 2005 Italian study on the
carcinogenicity of aspartame, prompted British MP, Roger
Williams, a scientist, after a year of looking into the
safety of aspartame, to state what he found “truly
horrified” him. What he told his colleagues on the floor
of Commons was that “sound science and proper regulatory
and political independence had been notable by their absence
from approval of aspartame.”
The specific statute Stephen Fox found that gives legs to
the whole New Mexico campaign, and perhaps in your state as
well, is as follows:
“A food shall be deemed to be adulterated
1. if it contains any poisonous or deleterious
substance which may render it injurious;
2. if it contains any added poisonous or added
deleterious substance which is unsafe, and
3. if it consists in whole or in part of …decomposed
substance, or if it otherwise unfit.”
What now remains to be seen is if New Mexico officials will
buckle under the weight of corporate manipulation and/or
outright intimidation. The following letter sent to Dr.
Betty Martini, by New Mexico’s Chief Deputy Attorney
General, Stuart M. Bluestone, outlines the authority of the
Attorney General’s Office, and gives some assurances. We do
hope this is the case.
“Dear Dr. Martini:
Thank you for your letter raising concerns about aspartame
and/or the presence of mercury/thimerosal in vaccines. We
respect your sincerity and appreciate you taking the time to
write us about public health issues.
We, at the Attorney General’s Office are lawyers, not
scientists or public policy makers. Policy decisions based
on the review of available evidence are made by the
Governor’s appointed policymakers, e.g., the Environmental
Improvement Board or the Board of Pharmacy. Of course, the
Legislature and the Governor also ultimately determine
public policy for our State.
We may provide legal advise, subject to federal and state
laws, constitutional provisions and court cases, to elected
and appointed state officials. We always try to do the best
job we can to provide objective legal opinions. As we review
the relevant governing laws, please be assured that we will
be mindful of the important need to protect the public
health, safety and welfare.
Thank you for contacting us.”
*****
HOW YOU CAN HELP RIGHT NOW!
While it is sometimes hard to believe, the most powerful
political force in the world is the will of the people. When
enough people demand justice, politicians, public servants,
and even those who run global corporations, can be brought
to their senses to act in the public interest.
THE NEW MEXICO ACTION MATTERS TO
ALL OF US.
Ordinary citizens of New Mexico found a law on the books
that establishes that the state has the authority to protect
the public from unsafe foods.
Ordinary citizens of New Mexico are promoting a bill to
establish a permanent agency to watchdog the food supply.
Ordinary citizens of New Mexico have successfully petitioned
the Environmental Improvement Board and the Attorney
General’s Office to hold honest public hearings on the
safety of aspartame.
So what is the problem? There will be two meetings in the
first weeks of January in Santa Fe, New Mexico that could
dramatically alter future events, or, for that matter, put
an end to what the ordinary citizens of New Mexico have
expressly stated as their will. One meeting is with the
Attorney General’s Office and the Environmental Improvement
Board and the other with the Pharmacy Board. At those
meetings we hope that the Attorney General’s Office makes a
recommendation that the July hearing goes forward as
planned. So, if we are to act, it must be now to make sure
this happens.
Once the July hearing is secured, it’s up to the people to
keep the heat on to make sure it will be fair and impartial
and no funny stuff goes on behind closed doors among the
power brokers. Since what happens in Santa Fe in July has
national and international ramifications, it is up to all of
us to lend a hand to those in New Mexico who have done a
spectacular job bringing the aspartame scandal to public
view.
Consequently, we ask you to spend a few minutes during your
New Year’s weekend to send this article to all your friends
and urge them to join you in deluging the capital of New
Mexico with e-mail messages from all over in support of the
ordinary people of New Mexico.
Please have these e-mail messages sent to:
Governor Bill Richardson c/o Chief of Staff Dave Contarino
at: dave.contarino@state.nm.us
Please thank the Governor for putting Senate Bill 525 to
create the Nutrition Council on the Call and giving it his
Executive Message.
Please tell him you support states' rights to regulate
harmful products especially now when it is obvious the FDA
has failed in its regulatory responsibilities on a number of
drugs and other products such as aspartame.
Attorney General,
The Honorable Patricia Madrid
ewood@ago.state.nm.us
Deputy General, Stuart Bluestone
sbluestone@ago.state.nm.us
Please tell both Ms. Madrid and Mr. Bluestone that you
support their desire to defend New Mexico's right to
challenge the safety of an FDA-approved product such as
aspartame, particularly when it is so obvious it should
never been approved at all.
© 2005 Carolyn Dean - All Rights Reserved