|
(Editor’s Opening Comment: The various
health-food and supplement trade associations in the United
States, Canada, and elsewhere claim to represent the interests
of their member companies when it comes to domestic
legislation and international guidelines such as Codex
Alimentarius. While sometimes sharing the same interests as
these trade associations, we have all-too-often found them to
be, at best, short-sighted and, at worst, only willing to
represent the interests of their few, largest corporate member
companies to the very-real detriment of health-conscious
individuals and smaller, innovative companies. One such trade
association’s representative recently argued in print that the
Codex Alimentarius guidelines pose absolutely no threat to
domestic American supplement laws and then widely disseminated
his views. The following article was written as a response.)
John Venardos, writing with a confidence born of
years of pharmaceutical-industry experience at Pfizer and G.D.
Searle, assures us that he is “setting the record straight”
about Codex Alimentarius./1 In his article of the same title,
he proceeds to tell us that Codex is good for us, based as it
is upon “science,” that we have nothing to fear, and that the
Codex naysayers are all wrong. This, by the way, from the man
who worked with Donald Rumsfeld at G.D. Searle to push toxic
aspartame on an unsuspecting public, and then later while at
Pfizer to help it promote GM organisms for sale, the terrible
results of both of which are only now becoming increasingly
evident.
Fool Me Once, Shame on You. Fool Me Twice, Shame on Me.
Now, Venardos wants you to trust what he says
about Codex. Throwing organizational names around with
liberal abandon – names such as the Council for Responsible
Nutrition (CRN) and the International Alliance of Dietary Food
Supplement Associations (IADSA), he wants to impress us with
the name-dropping fact that he is not alone. No indeed, he’s
not alone; he has his fat-cat pharmaceutical-industry pals
backing him up on this point. And why not? With the
pharmaceutical industry buying into the dietary-supplement
business for, what is to them, chump change, they can afford
to buy up enough companies to enable them to take over the
dietary-supplement trade associations. And from there, the
names that you have long trusted in the past can be used as
platforms to make you believe almost anything.
Such as Venardos’ assertion that a “misinformation
campaign” about Codex is being “financed in part by companies
that are not strangers to regulatory enforcement actions.”
Nice try. But anyone with a room-temperature I.Q. and a memory
to match will remember that Venardos’ current employer,
Herbalife, is itself no stranger to “regulatory enforcement
actions.” In fact, Herbalife is one of the all-time
prize-winners of regulatory enforcement, having received a
royal black eye from the California State Attorney General’s
Office to the tune of $850,000 back in 1986 - not to mention
the huge sums it expended in attorneys’ fees and costs
defending itself against the regulators then and since.
So is Venardos’ Freudian slip of the pen telling
us something? Since Herbalife leads the pack of
regulatory-enforcement victims, perhaps Venardos’ conscience
is forcing him to admit to a disinformation (not
misinformation) campaign of his own. And as disinformation
campaigns go, his is quite a whopper. Just look at the real
facts.
Codex Will Be Based Upon Junk Science
For someone who claims to have attended Codex
meetings for twenty years, Venardos is strangely naïve when he
claims that “For the first time, this Codex guideline provides
industry, consumers and governments with a real opportunity to
achieve international harmonization involving the trade of
vitamin and mineral supplements based on sound science and
empirical methods, versus the application of arbitrary upper
limits.” It is fortunate for Venardos that he used the word
“opportunity,” but not so fortunate that he modified it with
the word “real.”
As anyone who actually spends one day at the Codex
meetings will quickly realize, the European Union (EU) is in
the driver’s seat. The rest of us are just along for the
ride. And quite a ride it is, for while the EU has indeed
agreed that Codex may take a science-based approach to setting
upper limits for vitamins and minerals, the science that it is
based upon is not the objective science that Venardos dreams
about. Rather, it is a harshly cynical “science” that views
vitamins and minerals as dangerous threats to the World’s
large pharmaceutical industries – threats that must be
eliminated. The problem is they just don’t know yet where to
bury the bodies, so for the moment they are content to gag and
bind them tightly and throw them into a dark closet.
For those of us who do pay attention to these
details, we have noticed that the same Chairman who oversees
the Codex Committee establishing the Codex Vitamin and
Mineral Food Supplement Guidelines is – curiously enough -
the same gentleman at the German Risk Assessment Institute (BfR)
that has used flat-earth “science” to establish maximum
permitted levels for vitamins at such astonishingly low levels
as 1.3 milligrams for Vitamin B1 and 5.4 milligrams for
Vitamin B6, when the normal store levels are easily 20 to 40
times that. And in case you were wondering, yes, he does call
himself a “doctor.”
Venardos can dream all he wants, while the real
world of European science marches on. If the BfR has its way,
and so far it is appearing as if it is on track to accomplish
exactly that, then labels won’t matter at all. Venardos can
call them “science-based” levels or “magical” levels or
“pretty-please levels with whipped cream on top” until he’s
blue in the face, the reality will be that the levels adopted
by Codex will be as close to RDA levels as one can get without
having to take out a marriage license.
Codex Is a Domestic Threat
Again, for someone who claims to have attended
Codex meetings for twenty years, Venardos is also strangely
silent about the connection between the Codex food-supplement
guidelines and the World Trade Organization (WTO). Does he
think that the Codex guidelines are being created in a
vacuum? Has he not seen the obvious parallelism between the
harshly-restrictive EU’s Food Supplements Directive and the
Codex Guidelines? Has he not read the language in the
Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Agreement and the Central
American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) and made the minimal
mental connection necessary to realize that as a signatory
member of the WTO, the United States is absolutely duty-bound
to comply with the WTO’s dictates in trade disputes?
Of course he has. The pharmaceutical companies
did not get to be the most profitable businesses on the planet
by hiring idiots. Venardos has put two and two together and
come up with the right number. He and his employers know
very well that as this increasingly interwoven web of
treaties, international agreements, and non-democratic
bureaucratic rulemaking takes hold it will force all member
countries – including the United States - into the common fold
of harmonization. It is right there in print for any literate
person to read:
"To harmonize sanitary and phytosanitary measures on
as wide a basis as possible, Members shall base their
food safety measures on international standards, guidelines or
recommendations." (Article 3 of the SPS Agreement,
enforced by WTO) (emphasis added)
Remember, Codex is being touted as a “consumer
protection” measure even more than it is a trade-enhancement
vehicle. To most of the World’s population and virtually all
of its health bureaucrats, vitamins and minerals can be
dangerous to human health. In their medieval minds,
vitamin-and-mineral supplements are not even necessary, while
high-dose vitamins and minerals are a major
public-health risk. That is why the German BfR has
established as its “Maximum Permitted Levels” such absurdly
low potencies for most vitamins and minerals. They
claim it is a food-safety measure.
So, Venardos can wrap himself in the American flag
while holding up a copy of the Dietary Supplement Health and
Education Act (DSHEA) as a shield all he wants; but when the
inevitable trade dispute comes thundering down from the
heavens contending that American high-dose vitamins and
minerals are a dangerous violation of the food-safety measures
of Codex, and we have yes-women FDA bureaucrats to defend us
before the WTO Trade Dispute Board on non-existent legal
grounds, will the U.S. Congress pay the billion-dollar trade
sanction or change DSHEA to match Codex standards? You know
the answer, Congress will cut and run in a New York second.
And They Know It
The saddest thing, though, is that Venardos knows
this. CRN knows this. IADSA knows this. Even the National
Nutritional Foods Association (NNFA) knows this. They all
know it. They must. They just don’t care.
They also must think that you, the readers of
Venardos’ fantasy article, are idiots – that you will buy into
whatever they tell you. After all, they are the trade
associations and the experts; they must be telling you
the truth. Together, we all fought the good fight for DSHEA
some twelve years ago and won. We are all in this together
once again, right?
Wrong. Times have changed. The players have
changed. People have died, people have been born. Companies
have come and gone. Some have even grown . . . and been
bought up by bean counters and pharmaceutical interests who
look not to freedom and customer interests but instead to the
bottom line. They are the ones who now sit at the
trade-association meetings and call the shots.
And what is the bottom line? Globalize the market
and sell as many mass-produced, non-innovative food
supplements as you profitably can without challenging the drug
companies’ health monopoly. Open the World’s business doors
everywhere to me-too blandness that sells but will rarely
heal. And to hell with innovative products, freedom of
choice, and real science.
Codex is their vehicle for driving home their
secret agenda, and they are counting on us to be naïve enough
and stupid enough to buy it. Just don’t be fooled by the
fancy paint job and the salesmen’s slick sales talk, this
vehicle will leave us stranded on the most desolate highway
you could ever imagine. You can bet your life on it.
|