You might wonder why this article
(printed below) which appeared in today's The Independent
(UK) on the Camelford scandal is relevant to those concerned
about fluoride. There are several points of contact.
1) Accidents happen. This accident happened in
Camelford when 20 tons of aluminium sulfate was dumped in
the wrong tank at a water treatment plant and ended up in
the drinking water. On several occasions accidents have also
happened during fluoride additions in water plants, several
resulting in sickness and in one case death. Trucking
accidents have also occurred. For a listing of accidents see
our web page
www.FluorideAction.net. Also workers have been exposed
directly to the highly toxic fluoridating chemicals and have
become sick - there is another newspaper story about that
today (see story in today's Charleston Post and Courier,
below). So accidents happen, so what's the big deal? Well
look at alternative ways of fighting tooth decay in
children? Accidents happen, but few when one is brushing
one's teeth or eating a good diet!
2) Doug Cross. Doug Cross, whose wife was killed by
this exposure to aluminium sulfate, is also working very
hard to fight fluoridation. Not only has he co-authored an
article with Bob Carton on the unethical nature of the
practice (published in the International Journal of
Occuptional & Environmental Health) but he has also
recently found that the practice is illegal under European
law.
3) Absorbing chemicals from bath water. I am often
asked as to whether taking a bath in fluoridated water would
increase exposure to the fluoride ion. Normally only fat
soluble substances can cross the skin's fatty layers, but my
gut feeling says that in the warm water the pores would open
and thus allow water soluble substances (like fluoride) to
cross the skin. But I would like to see this confirmed with
an experiment in which blood samples are taken before and
after a bath. Meanwhile, in this regrettable accident it
would appear that Doug Cross's wife was exposed to aluminium
through her bath water.
4) Aluminium and Alzhheimer's disease. There has been
a long ongoing dispute as to whether aluminium causes
Alzhheimer's disease or whether it simply accumulates with
the disease. The dramatic symptoms experienced by Mrs. Cross
and others, would certainly appear to indicate that
aluminium damages the brain.
5) Varner's study. In 1998, in an article in the
journal Brain Research by Varner and co-workers, it
was shown that fluoride in water (both as sodium fluoride or
aluminium fluoride) caused a greater uptake of aluminium
into the brains of rats, as well as the formation of beta
amyloid deposits which are characteristic of Alzheimer's
disease. This and other studies of fluoride's impacts on the
brain were thoroughly discussed in chapter 7 of the NRC
report (March 22, 2006). Could there have been fluoride in
the chemicals in the Camelford accident?
6) Government and industry deny problem. Note that
when citizens complained of their symptoms, the government
denied any connection with the incident. The author writes:
"Hundreds of people complained of skin
burns, rashes, ulcers, sore mouths and joints, memory loss
and other symptoms , which they attributed to the aluminium
and other metals that the chemical had dissolved from supply
pipes.
Their complaints were dismissed after controversial
inquiries held by the water authority and by the Department
of Health."
Once again we see the tendency of
government to deny any connection between health effects and
accidents involving big economic interests or its own
operations. In the case of fluoridation, governments
continue to deny that any one is super-sensitive to fluoride
and yet they have never conducted any scientific testing on
this matter, despite formal suggestions that they do so (NHMRC,
1991) and despite the numerous case studies (Waldbott et al.
1978) as well as trials of people tested with sodium
fluoride tablets versus placebo (Feltman and Kossel, 1968),
which indicate that some people are indeed sensitive to low
doses of fluoride.
All in all, the Camelford story is of great relevance to
those concerned about fluoridation and fluoride toxicity.
Paul Connett