Editor of Health Freedom News
Board Member and Legal Counsel for NHF
July 2005
The anti-supplement bias of the European
Union (EU) became even more apparent when a recent working
document drafted by the European Commission proposed that a
European Directive be put in place to regulate enzymes. This
proposal is already supported by a number of European
countries and is expected to be implemented by the end of this
year.
Basically, the proposed Directive would
require expensive dossiers of safety and technical information
on each enzyme before it could be sold or consumed. Insanely,
this Directive would also require that before a food enzyme
could appear on the Commission’s “positive list” (a list of
enzymes that are approved), the company wanting to market the
enzyme would also have to prove that there is a “technological
need” for this enzyme that is not already met by other means!
Of course, its proponents argue that this
is all a necessary part of the EU’s effort to harmonize its
member States’ various laws. But by using this argument,
these people gloss over the real reason for this strict of a
Directive being put in place: To eliminate competition for
the big pharmaceutical players.
There is absolutely no reason whatsoever to
require enzymes to prove themselves safe prior to sale.
Enzymes are already well proven safe by their safe use over
the millennia by humans and animals. The Europeans should
focus their attention instead on those products and
service-providers that are already shown to be risky:
Prescription drugs, over-the-counter drugs, doctors, and toxic
new chemicals brewed from a witches’ tub of who knows what.
Hundreds of thousands, even millions, have died from those
causes; but how many can they show actually died from
consuming enzymes, particularly natural ones? Do we even
need to give the answer to this question?
And the proof that this Directive is just
another hatchet-job being performed by the Commission for its
pharmaceutical paymasters is amply shown by the fact that an
enzyme must demonstrate a so-called “technological need” that
no one else is meeting before the enzyme can be approved for
sale! This is the same kind of moronic thinking that would
have kept electricity off the streets and out of private homes
because in 1900 there was ample gas lighting everywhere.
The EU economy is in bad-enough shape
without straight-jacketing itself with this kind of
nonsensical and anti-free-market thinking. We wonder if it
ever occurs to these bureaucrats when they are thinking up
these hare-brained regulations the full extent to which they
are severely harming and handicapping their economies – that
is, putting real human beings out of work and impoverishing
them.
The problem, though, is that the madness
does not stop at European shores. The U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), with stars in its eyes for anything and
everything that its Euro-FDA cousins do, constantly tries to
implement the same kind of rules and regulations that it
enviously sees its European counterparts imposing. Each
tightening of the noose around consumers and manufacturers
that takes place in Europe is just more grist for the mill in
the United States and Canada.
That is why the National Health
Federation has taken such an active interest in not only
stopping the FDA’s congressional attack dogs from passing
anti-health-freedom legislation but has projected itself
forward internationally over the last decade or more and
fought those insane rules and regulations that, in our
increasingly international world, will also affect North
America.