For some eight weeks, One Click has been reporting adverse vaccine reactions data, disability and death. These many occurrences have in the main been reported by concerned doctors. We provide a very brief selected list below.
This is not as ethically compromised vaccine industry defender Vivienne Parry would have you believe in the Observer on 8 July 2007. "It's a very small risk. If you have a vaccine, it will damage some children, but a very small number," she says.
Parry is obviously wrong as a mere *eight weeks* of adverse reactions vaccine data reporting from around the world on One Click has so demonstrably shown. Being blatantly incorrect and going against all the evidence has never stopped discredited rent-a-mouth Parry in the past and doubtless never will in the future. Such is the bought and paid for fear of many governments over the vaccines controversy for which they are to be held directly responsible.
Although it is the MMR vaccine currently on trial in both the USA and in Britain, these proceedings and the following publicity will hopefully serve to expose a much bigger and wider issue than just one vaccine and its component parts.
The CDC advises that children should get 49 doses of 14 vaccines by age six, double the number 'recommended' by government 25 years ago. (Source, NVIC). Parents and many doctors are starting to realise that you cannot stick multiple vaccines into the unformed immune systems of the very young in such an intense combination and number without expecting adverse reactions in many, with the numbers growing every day. From death to lifetime disability, the evidence speaks for itself. What is being done by the vaccine industry to our children and the antecedent risk has become a price not worth paying by many.
It is a given that the vaccine industry has saved many lives. It is also a given that its conduct over the last 25 years has been appalling and not in the best interests of humanity. Rushing vaccines to market without sufficient trials of efficacy and safety in order to obtain the largest slice of the vaccine pie, the vaccine industry has damaged itself beyond repair leaving the dead, disabled and horrified in its wake.
This coupled with the fact that vaccines by definition create replacement disease as so clearly shown in the recent JAMA Paper on invasive pneumococcal disease, flagged by vaccine writer Arthur Allen, has rightly resulted in correctly placed ever growing consumer mistrust.
Allen wrote, "The rise of 19A has stirred up some old [vaccine replacement disease] fears. In the 1960s, for example, many public-health specialists were concerned that immunity would wane in toddlers getting the new measles and rubella vaccines, causing them to become infected later in life. This was of particular concern because rubella infection during pregnancy can cause severe birth defects, including autism. Similar fears followed the 1991 introduction of infant vaccines for haemophilus influenza type B, or HiB, disease. They've also been voiced about the new cervical cancer vaccine, which prevents infections by the two deadliest human papilloma viruses but which theoretically could allow other viral strains to move into the niche and cause just as much cancer."
Even when considerable evidence is out on the table for all to see, the reaction of the vaccine industry - together with governments - has been to stifle inquiry and to attempt to marginalise, ridicule and destroy all those asking the most legitimate and serious of questions.
An unstoppable grass roots organic movement is growing over the vaccines issue. This is largely thanks to the internet. Academic papers and media coverage of health issues today are now available from one click of the mouse. Exposure of mal reporting and evidenced accounts of what has actually transpired is now common internet currency, fired around the world in nano seconds.
The outcome of the Fitness to Practice Hearings on Dr Andrew Wakefield and his colleagues due to start tomorrow will not be decided by the General Medical Council, much as this discredited body wishes it could be so. No. The outcome of this trial will be decided by the court of public opinion.
Health hath no fury like the parents of dead and disabled children medically marginalised to serve the best interests of the vaccine industry and its adherents, forecast by analysts to be worth $19.2 Billion by 2010.
You can fool some of the people some of the time to vast and lucrative effect, but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time with the evidence presented today.
I don’t actually fancy the vaccine industry’s chances. Do you?
************************************
For Further Information:
A very, very small selection of vaccine media coverage during the last few weeks, often provided by doctors.
India Children Paralysed By Polio Vaccine, The Lancet
MMR Vaccine Suspended in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Vietnam Suspends Hepatitis B Vaccine - Children Dead
Euvax B vaccine suspended on precautionary basis
Rabies vaccine used in Vietnam unsafe
500 Rushed To Hospital - Cholera and Typhoid Vaccines Blamed
Vaccines - Greatest Scandal In Medical History
Is This Vaccine Safe, Jerome Burne, Daily Mail

