Become a Member

Your membership in NHF will impact 7 billion lives on this Planet.

Join Us

Support NHF’s Work!

Please consider making a gift today to support the NHF’s work.


Free e-List

Get the latest updates impacting your health and health freedom!




Thousands of college students both new and returning, will be heading back to school for the spring semester. But for some students--not without their meningitis vaccine first.

It is something that can be prevented, but has the potential to become deadly.

"The toxins of the bacteria take people's legs and their arms first so that's usually where people start seeing bruising and they're starting to get sicker, so people will actually lose their limbs first before they lose their lives but it is a deadly disease,” said Brazos County Health Department Nurse Julie Anderson.

According to the Centers for Disease Control, nearly 1,200 people in the U.S. contract bacterial meningitis each year -- 15 percent die -- which is why the state is stepping in and urging you to protect your health.

Demand for the Bacterial Meningitis vaccine has caused several health departments across the state to run out.

"We have approximately 65 doses on hand today, but those are dropping steadily because we started with almost 200 doses," added Anderson.

Last February, bacterial meningitis claimed the life of 20-year-old A&M student Nicolis "Nico" Williams. Williams lived off campus and was not required to get the vaccine. But lawmakers say now, that's not the case. Senate Bill 1107 becomes effective January 1, 2012 -- requiring all new students, transfer students and returning students to provide proof of the vaccination. This law even includes A&M students taking one or two classes at Blinn.

The new law does NOT apply to the following groups of students:
•Student is 30 years of age or older by the first day of the semester
•Student is enrolled only in online courses or other distance education courses
•Dual enrolled student who does not attend class on campus

Newly admitted students at Texas A&M who have not provided documentation of vaccination will have an immunization deficiency hold placed on their account. The hold will be removed once the appropriate immunization documentation has been provided to Texas A&M. The immunization deficiency hold will prevent you from registering for classes, so it is imperative that you fulfill this requirement prior to or immediately upon your arrival at your New Student Conference.

The rising price of vaccines coupled with federal budget cuts, are calling for changes at the Brazos County Health Department.

"We have two messages, we do have the vaccine for college kids whether you have insurance or you do not have insurance through Jan 1, 2010; But starting Jan 1, 2010 if you have insurance, we ask that you do make it back to your primary care physician that you do" explained Anderson.

“I think it's good I think all of us need to protect ourselves from different diseases,” said high school student, Miranda Garrott.

While the cost of the vaccine depends on your insurance provider -- the cost is nothing compared to the potentially lethal outcome of not being protected.

According to the Texas A&M website:

If you arrive at your New Student Conference and have not yet fulfilled this requirement, vaccinations will be available at the Beutel Health Center on campus at a cost of $110. Payment by check or credit card for the vaccine can be made when the vaccination is administered, or it can be added to your fee statement. Students are highly encouraged to take care of this requirement prior to the New Student Conference, as the cost of the vaccination may be lower through your current health care provider.

If you are a new or returning student to Texas A&M, you can click on the link below to find out if you meet the requirements. TAMU ELIGIBILITY

Using the Federal Court System to Uncover the Criminal Conspiracy ...

Yes, you read that subtitle above correctly. 

We the people of the United States formed a government "of the people, by the people, and for the people" a long time ago, and we fully intend that government to stay within our control.

There are those within our society who have every intent to abuse our systems for their own benefit.  Often, history shows, those abusers work within that system, as employees, advisors, consultants, whatever.

That is not news, nor is it a new situation that we the people have to suddenly deal with.  Our founding fathers (and mothers) understood the foibles of humanity and built into our political arena a system of checks and balances.  That system is reflected at every level in our government; federal, state and local.

In the federal system, for instance, the founders divided our government into three distinct entities each watching the other two, insuring that none become despotic.  Those divisions; the Executive, the Congress, and the Judicial, just by their design, perform that function.

More, there are redundant systems - meaning that there is usually more than one way to keep one of our created government units in line, performing the functions we intended for them in the way we intended.  The Maryland Board of Physicians, for instance, has found out the hard way, recently, that those systems exist and can be readily activated to put a ring in their nose, so to speak, and lead them back onto the path of righteousness.  Click here, and here, to read the two articles (so far) about this situation.

In the first four articles titled "The CDC has know all along how dangerous vaccines are - and has covered it up..." I laid out, for the readers, the story parts:  (1)  the Starting Point, (2)  the Lawsuit Against the CDC, (3)  What the Government Agencies Actually Knew, and (4)  and What The "Vaccine Construction" Is and Does. 

In this fifth article of this series I will explain where this is all going, what is really happening here - the use of the Judiciary branch of the US Government to rein in the activities of an out-of-control federal agency - the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) - a Division of the US Department of Health and Human Services.

And something more.  Much more.  It is time for criminal indictment.

Read more-

This story, detailed by David Willman in the LA Times (and blogged by me 4 weeks ago) has now been re-reported (in great detail for television) by CNN.  It certainly deserves plenty of scrutiny, especially after SIGA's stock rose 32% yesterday, supposedly due to board member Fran Townsend's denying company interference with the contract.  DHHS (what a surprise!) even had the temerity to tell CNN that replacing the government's chief negotiator saved the taxpayer lots of money!

In case you forgot, the issues are these:

SIGA is selling the govt (for $433 million to 2.8 billion) a drug developed with government money to treat smallpox. No one knows if it works.  SIGA's controlling shareholder is Ron Perelman, a billionaire Democratic donor.  Contracting requirements were changed several times to ensure SIGA got the contract, and at a very high price.

Former administrations made sweetheart deals for 2 smallpox vaccines, for a total cost over a billion dollars, during the Clinton and Bush administrations.  There is enough vaccine for every American in a stockpile.  The vaccine works up to 4 days after an exposure.  There is no real need for a drug too.

The Obama administration, it appears, did not want to miss out on the opportunity (which generating fear of bioterrorism has provided) to spend huge amounts of taxpayer funds on useless products.  At least now a light is shining into the fetid swamp of bioterrorism procurements.  SIGA's is only one of many questionable deals.

Andreas Bachmair

Due to many requests is conducting a new survey on the state of health of vaccinated children. We want to compare the results of this survey to the results of our survey on thestate of health of unvaccinated children.  If you have vaccinated children please go to the questionnaire for the state of health of vaccinated children.

Thanks very much for your support.


Related Links:
Survey Results - Unvaccinated Children Health Status
Andreas Bachmair, VaccineInjury

The emerging generation of unvaccinated children will be among the healthiest in the world, and they'll have their parents to thank. The refusal of significant numbers of parents to vaccinate their children has created a sizable population numbering in the millions around the world and has raised a number of important public health issues, namely why do we continue to vaccinate at all.

Unvaccinated children will never have dangerous, immune suppressing, carcinogenic, neurotoxic and infertility promoting chemicals pumped into their bodies. These include those chemicals that are found in almost every FDA approved vaccine. 

According to Dr. Buchwald, "the reason vaccinations are promoted with such intensity is to prevent people from realising that vaccines do not protect and also in the event of an outbreak or an epidemic the vaccinated are as much at risk of becoming infected as the unvaccinated. The truth can be kept hidden if people's vaccination status remains unknown and if everyone is vaccinated, making a comparison with unvaccinated people impossible. This is also the real reason for the relentless push to vaccinate as many children as possible."

"I have not seen autism with the Amish," said Dr. Frank Noonan, a family practitioner in Lancaster County, Pa., who has treated thousands of Amish for a quarter-century. "You'll find all the other stuff, but we don't find the autism. We're right in the heart of Amish country and seeing none, and that's just the way it is." 

More educated parents are less likely to vaccinate, which contradicts the misconceptions of many health professionals who profess that parents don't vaccinate because they are under-educated, poor or misinformed.

More encouraging for anti-vaccine advocates is the finding that highly educated parents also reduced their uptake of other non-controversial childhood vaccines, a good sign that most of the hidden toxins in vaccines are slowly being discovered by parents and the public in general.

According to 
historical charts, graphs and two centuries of official statistics, we know that vaccines have never prevented any diseases and are in now way responsible for improving life expectancy and survival from disease in western economies. In North America, Europe, and the South Pacific, major declines in life-threatening infectious diseases occurred historically either without, or far in advance of public vaccination efforts for specific diseases.

In a just-published shocking study virology researchers at the 
Erasmus Medical Center in the Netherlands have demonstrated that a regular flu vaccine in children actually worsens a key aspect of their flu-fighting immune system. This research was not conducted by vaccine-disliking scientists. Rather, it was conducted by pro-vaccine researchers who have spent their careers trying to develop better vaccines. Lead author Rogier Bodewes delivered the sobering message as he explained that flu vaccines “have potential drawbacks that have previously been under appreciated and that are also a matter of debate.”

It involved highly advanced scientific evaluation of the immune system. The researchers collected blood from 27 healthy, unvaccinated children with an average age of 6 years old, and 14 children with cystic fibrosis who received an annual flu shot. The unvaccinated children were found to have a superior immune response, giving them broader protection against what they might face in an actual flu season, including pandemic strains.

We have about 30,000 or 35,000 children that we've taken care of over the years, and I don't think we have a single case of autism in children delivered by us who never received vaccines.......Every doctor now essentially in this country has done something as heinous as the Nazis did, unknowingly," stated Dr. Mayer Eisenstein.

According to 
[2011 Aug] State of health of unvaccinated children: Illnesses in unvaccinated children, the results show that unvaccinated children are far less affected by common diseases.

Asthma, hayfever and neurodermatitis.....
A recent German study with 17461 children between 0-17 years of age (KIGGS) showed that 4.7% of these children suffer from asthma, 10.7% of these children from hayfever and 13.2% from neurodermatitis. These numbers differ in western countries, i.e. the prevalence of asthma among children in the US is 6% whereas it is 14-16% in Australia (Australia's Health 2004, AIHW). The prevalence of asthma among unvaccinated children in our study is 0.2%, hayfever 1.5% and neurodermatitis 2%.

According to the KIGGS study more than 40% of children between the ages of 3 and 17 years were sensitized against at least one allergen tested (20 common allergens were tested) and 22.9% had an allergic disease. Although we did not perform a bloodtest, less than 10% stated that their children had an allergy.

There are also autism cases in unvaccinated children. However over 80% stated, that it is only a mild form or a high functioning form of autism. Among all participants there were 4 severe autism cases. Of these 4 children one tested very high for metals (mercury, aluminum, arsenic), in another case the mother was tested very high for mercury.
KIGGS showed that 12.8% of the children in Germany had herpes and 11% suffer from otitis media (an inflammation of the middle ear). If you compare this to unvaccinated childen you can see that herpes among unvaccinated children is very rare (less than 0.5%).

In young kids under the age of 3 warts are very rare. After the 3 years of age, however, the prevalence is rising. In the ages between 4 and 6 years, 5-10% of the kids have warts, in the age group 16-18, 15-20% have warts. (Source: Only 3% of unvaccinated children in our survey have warts.

"I observed that my unvaccinated children were healthier, hardier and more robust than their vaccinated peers. Allergies, asthma and pallor and behavioral and attentional disturbances were clearly more common in my young patients who were vaccinated. My unvaccinated patients, on the other hand, did not suffer from infectious diseases with any greater frequency or severity than their vaccinated peers: their immune systems generally handled these challenges very well."--Incao's Hepatitis B Vaccination Testimony

Unvaccinated kids are five times less likely to have asthma than the vaccinated, 2.5 times less likely to have skin problems and 8 times less likely to be hyperactive. .
Vaccinated children are up to 14 times more likely to have asthma than the unvaccinated and up to nine times more like to have skin problems. .
The long-term question which vaccine advocates persist in asking is what will the general health of this unvaccinated population be like? Well, from what we can deduce from the data so far, there is a strong indication that unvaccinated children will likely make up the healthiest populations in the world someday. Thank you Mom, Dad and every researcher and journalist who is exposing vaccines for what they really are.
Dave Mihalovic is a Naturopathic Doctor who specializes in vaccine research, cancer prevention and a natural approach to treatment.